Distribution coefficients of REE between Fe oxyhydroxide precipitates and NaCl solutions affected by REE-carbonate complexation
Iwao Kawabe, Atsuyuki Ohta, Noriko Miura
Geochemical Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, P. 181-197, 1999
ABSTRACT
Distribution coefficients of REE between Fe oxyhydroxide precipitates and NaCl solutions doped with NaHCO3 have been determined in pH = 8.1-8.6 and at room temperature and pressure. The coefficient is defined as Kd(REE: ppt./sol.), where REE designates each lanthanide (Ln), Y or Sc. The NaHCO3 concentration was changed in the range of (0∼12) × 10-3 M under a constant NaCl concentration (0.45 M). Kd(Sc) rapidly approaches Kd(Lu) as [NaHCO3] increases. Kd(Y) is lower than Kd(Ho) even in solutions with high [NaHCO3]. The convex tetrad effect in logKd(Ln) becomes less conspicuous with increasing [NaHCO3]. We proposed a method to determine REE-carbonate complexation constants from observed variations of Kd(REE) with increasing [CO32-, aq]. In solutions with [NaHCO3] ≥ 1 × 10-2 M, the dominant dissolved REE species are REE(CO3)2-(aq) except for La. We have tentatively determined the stability constants of β2 for REE(CO3)2-(aq) from our preliminary data set, although β1 for REECO3+(aq) could not be estimated. The series variation of logβ2 are compatible with literature values. On the basis of the refined spin-pairing energy theory (RSPET), we have analyzed the series variations of logβ2 and logKd(Ln) values with and without Ln(III)-carbonate complexation effect. Racah E1 parameter is approximately the same between Ln(OH)3·nH2O as the precipitate and Ln(CO3)2-(aq), whereas Racah E3 parameter of Ln(CO3)2-(aq) is only slightly larger than that of Ln(OH)3·nH2O. This is the reason that the convex tetrad effect of logKd(Ln) diminishes as Ln(III)-carbonate complexation proceeds. Our experimental logKd(Ln) values and apparent logKd(Ln) ones from marine Mn-Fe deposit/seawater pairs suggest that reported log(β1/β2) values for light Ln are slightly smaller than those ought to be.
All Issues
- Vol.58, 2024
- Vol.57, 2023
- Vol.56, 2022
- Vol.55, 2021
- Vol.54, 2020
- Vol.53, 2019
- Vol.52, 2018
- Vol.51, 2017
- Vol.50, 2016
- Vol.49, 2015
- Vol.48, 2014
- Vol.47, 2013
- Vol.46, 2012
- Vol.45, 2011
- Vol.44, 2010
- Vol.43, 2009
- Vol.42, 2008
- Vol.41, 2007
- Vol.40, 2006
- Vol.39, 2005
- Vol.38, 2004
- Vol.37, 2003
- Vol.36, 2002
- Vol.35, 2001
- Vol.34, 2000
- Vol.33, 1999
- Vol.32, 1998
- Vol.31, 1997
- Vol.30, 1996
- Vol.29, 1995
- Vol.28, 1994
- Vol.27, 1993
- Vol.26, 1992
- Vol.25, 1991
- Vol.24, 1990
- Vol.23, 1989
- Vol.22, 1988
- Vol.21, 1987
- Vol.20, 1986
- Vol.19, 1985-1986
- Vol.18, 1984
- Vol.17, 1983
- Vol.16, 1982
- Vol.15, 1981
- Vol.14, 1980
- Vol.13, 1979
- Vol.12, 1978
- Vol.11, 1977
- Vol.10, 1976
- Vol.9, 1975
- Vol.8, 1974
- Vol.7, 1973
- Vol.6, 1972-1973
- Vol.5, 1971
- Vol.4, 1970-1971
- Vol.3, 1969-1970
- Vol.2, 1968
- Vol.1, 1966-1967